Supreme Court Nomination - Talking Points

• Judge Sotomayor will allow her feelings and personal politics to stand in the way of basic fairness.  In a recent case, Ricci v. DeStefano, Sotomayor sided with a city that used racially discriminatory practices to deny promotions to firefighters.  The per curiam opinion Sotomayor joined went so far out of its way to bury the
firefighters’ important claims of unfair treatment that her colleague, Judge Jose Cabranes, a Clinton appointee, chastised her.

o According to Judge Cabranes, Sotomayor’s opinion “contains no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at the core of this case” and its “perfunctory disposition rests uneasily with the weighty issues presented by this appeal.”  Even the liberal Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen expressed disappointment with the case,
stating, “Ricci is not just a legal case but a man who has been deprived of the pursuit of happiness on account of race.”

o Sotomayor’s terrible decision in Ricci is under review by the Supreme Court and an opinion is expected by the end of June.

• Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases.  In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their “experiences as women and people of color,” which she believes should “affect our decisions.”  She went on to say in that same speech “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”  She reiterated her commitment to that lawless judicial philosophy at Duke Law School in 2005 when she stated that the “Court of Appeals is where policy is made.”

• The poor quality of Sotomayor’s decisions is reflected in her terrible record of reversals by the Supreme Court.

• Sotomayor is a favorite of far left special interest groups.  In addition to her record as a hard left judicial activist, Sotomayor has been recommended for the Supreme Court by Nan Aron of the very liberal Alliance for Justice,  who stated in a 2004 memo to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Sotomayor had “been through an initial
vetting and fit into the criteria that we believe should be the standard for any Supreme Court justice.”

• The White House is sure to argue that Sotomayor is a "bipartisan pick" because Bush 41 appointed her to the district court:  President George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor in 1991 only because the New York senators
had forced on the White House a deal that enabled Senator Moynihan to name one of every four district court nominees in New York.  In 1998, 29 Republican senators voted against President Clinton’s nomination of Sotomayor to the Second Circuit.